Friday, August 20, 2010

How to cope with the competition?

           I write this in response to the article of Mr. Sreenivas Injeti on 8th August 2010 in the open page section of ‘The Hindu’ titled The Snake boat and the Dragon boat (The same article has been posted in this blog below).  He has aptly depicted the way in which China has made progress in the field of sports. At the same time he has succinctly analysed why India has fallen back from recording similar progress in sports. I would like to add my thought to this Indian predicament.

When we compare India with China, we find lot of flaws in our developmental process. When China stood first in the rank list during the Olympics 2008 with 100 medals in hand, we were standing at 50th position with only 3 medals. Why this is so? In fact, the rule of single communist party has favoured China a lot. The developmental foresights of the administrators who rule China have taken it to this height with in such a short time. I do not mean that India don’t have foresighted leaders. But they are in different parties! If all these leaders had joined together in a single party India too could achieve much more advancement. Then, is it that the multi- party system is the blocking factor in the development of India? The answer is partly ‘yes’ and partly ‘no’. Because, the difference in political ideology keeps the political parties broken even in the issue of India’s prestige. Leaders are busy in blaming the others. Even if any action taken by a ruling party is good, the opposition party opposes it with a sense of ego. Further the politicians want to make the hay when the sun shines. They become ‘haves’ by accumulating money and add to the list of capitalists. But this problem is not there in China.
 Why the intelligentsia is quiet about this? Why the officers lack integrity in their action? What happens in India is that the IAS officers also  have to listen to the ministers who have very low educational qualifications. If they don’t heed to them the politicians use their power and transfer those officers who opposes the views of a politicians. Even the detective agencies like CBI are not acting like a constitutional body. They too have the pressures of political influences. So I think, unless we depoliticise the non-political institutions it is not possible to cope with the competition.
( I had sent this write up to The Hindu for Letter to the editor column. But it was not published.)                                      

The Snake boat and the Dragon boat

This is an article written by Sri Srinivas Injeti in 'The Hindu' on August 8, 2010.  Felt the matter is interesting. So posting it in my blog. My response to this article has also been posted.

The Snake boat, with over 400 years of history, dating back to the Kings of Alappuzha in Kerala, and the Dragon boat, with over 2000 years of history, associated with the iconic river of Chang Jiang (better known as the Yangtze in China), symbolise the strong tradition of indigenous sports in the two countries. But the sporting performance of India and China over the last five or six decades reminds us of the famous fable of the Tortoise and the Hare. India hosted the first Asiad in 1951, nearly four decades before China did it in 1990, but failed to reap the early bird advantage.
China, on the other hand, made its first appearance at the second Asiad in 1954 and stood sixth in the medal tally, just below India. However, unlike India, China fully recognised the power of sports and harnessed it completely. No wonder, the Tortoise slowly and steadily overtook the Hare. China came third in Tehran in the 1974 Asiad, second in Bangkok in the 1978 Asiad, and first in Delhi in 1982 Asiad; a position that it has retained for the past 28 years and is expected to repeat at Guangzhou later this year.
In Olympics, after drawing a blank in Helsinki in 1952, China withdrew from the Games for over three decades, before returning in 1984 and securing the fourth position at the Los Angeles Olympics. Finally, in 2008, at the Beijing Olympics, China topped the medal tally. Perseverance, patience and purposefulness paid off, and the Tortoise won the Olympic race!
China's continuous surge has been largely attributed to its single-minded mission to reach the top. It was all along focussed on the promotion of community and competitive sports to the highest standards. A Physical Health Law was passed in 1995, and it formed the basis of a nationwide physical fitness programme. With over 6,00,000 stadiums and 2,00,000 training centres, today more than 60 per cent of China's population aged between seven and 70, and 95 per cent of its student population meet the national fitness standards. No wonder, China has now emerged as a major sporting nation.
In stark contrast, India is still hugely deficient in sporting performance. Barring around 50 million, the population does not even have access to basic sporting facilities. More than half of the 1.2 million schools in the country have no access to playing-fields. There aren't enough sports and physical education instructors. And the integration of sports and physical education with school curriculum is still a far cry. Our pathetic sports performance says it all!
China ventured into hosting mega events only after establishing itself as a major sporting power. But once it took that responsibility, it never looked back. It has excelled in both staging the Games and topping the medal tally. China is credited with having staged the most spectacular Olympics till date, which has even left London, the only city to host Olympics thrice in the past, extremely nervous.
Our sports administrators, on the contrary, appear obsessed with staging mega events notwithstanding our indifferent sporting performance. The argument that mega events help to create a lasting sporting legacy, besides promoting excellence, still remains largely unsubstantiated, going by our own experience. Empirical evidence also shows that most countries that have hosted mega events have had a long track record of strong sporting performance. So, no matter how swanky Delhi looks, or how spectacular the opening ceremony of the forthcoming Commonwealth Games may be, our national prestige will essentially lie in our sporting performance and not merely in our staging performance.
China's focus on select sports is another reason for its success. Unlike our ‘Jack of all trades' approach, China's ‘focus sports' like gymnastics, weightlifting, table tennis, shooting, badminton, judo, swimming, and athletics and traditional sports are those having the maximum events and hence, offering maximum medal prospects. The problem staring us in the face is our abysmally low level of performance in core sports such as athletics, gymnastics and swimming. Hence, if at all we are to do well in international sports, we must start from scratch. Let's do what China did in 1995 – make sports for all, compulsory!
Another major advantage that China has over India is the inclusion of many of its traditional sports such as fencing, wushu and karate in major competitions, which account for nearly 50 events. India, on the other hand, has managed only the inclusion of kabaddi in Asiad.
Other traditional sports such as kushti (Indian- style wrestling), kho kho, mallakhamb, kalarippayattu and Thang Ta are still nowhere on the horizon of becoming international sports.
This brings us back to the Snake boat and Dragon boat story. While both, along with boats from other parts of the world, are poised to make an appearance at the 2012 London Olympics inaugural ceremony, Snake boat racing, as a sport, is yet to venture out beyond the Indian shores, whereas the Dragon boat racing has firmly established itself as a popular international sport, having already gained entry into the Asian Games and knocking at the doors of the Olympic Games.
Come on, India! Let's wake up as a nation, prepare ourselves as a nation, and compete as a nation to catch up with the Dragon boat!
( The writer is a civil servant and the views expressed here are his own. His email is srinivasinjeti26@gmail.com)
China ventured into hosting mega events only after establishing itself as a major sporting power. But once it took that responsibility, it never looked back. 

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

ಬಟ್ಲರ್ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್

ಈ ಲೇಖನವು ಸೆಪ್ಟೆಂಬರ್ 7, 2010 ರ ಕನ್ನಡ ಪ್ರಭದ 'ಕಾಲೇಜು ರಂಗ'ದಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರಕಟವಾಗಿದೆ.


                     "ಏನೋ ಚೇತನ್, ಹೇಗಿದ್ದೀಯ?!" ಬಹು ವರ್ಷಗಳ ನಂತರ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿದ್ದ ಗೆಳೆಯನನ್ನು ಕಂಡಾಗ ಸಂತೋಷವುಕ್ಕಿತು. "ಹಾಯ್, ಐ ಆಮ್ ಫೈನ್" ಎಂದ. ಹಿಂದೆಲ್ಲಾ "ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿದ್ದೇನೆ" ಅನ್ನುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಆತನ  ಉತ್ತರ ಕೇಳಿ ಏನಪ್ಪಾ ಇದು ವಿಚಿತ್ರ ಅಂತ ಅನ್ನಿಸಿತು. ಇಂಜಿನಿಯರಿಂಗ್ ಮುಗಿಸಿ ಬೆಂಗ್ಳೂರಲ್ಲಿ  ಕೆಲಸ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿ  ವರ್ಷ ಕಳೆಯುವಷ್ಟರಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡವೇ ಮರೆತುಹೋಯ್ತೇ? ಅಲ್ಲ, ಬಿ.ಇ. ಕಲಿಯುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾಗಲೂ  ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಷ್ಟು ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿ ಮಾತನಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಈತನ ನಾಲಗೆ ಇಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ದಪ್ಪಗಾಯಿತೇ? ಕನ್ನಡೋಚ್ಚರಣೆ ಇವನ ನಾಲಗೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಗುಚದಾಯಿತೇ ಅಂತ ಮನಸ್ಸಿನಲ್ಲೇ ಅಂದುಕೊಂಡೆ. ಹಾಗಂತ ಮುಖ ಭಾವದಲ್ಲಾಗಲೀ, ಮಾತಿನಲ್ಲಾಗಲೀ ಅದನ್ನು ತೋರ್ಪಡಿಸಲಿಲ್ಲ. ನಾನು ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲೇ ಮಾತು ಮುಂದುವರೆಸಿದೆ. "ಏನಯ್ಯಾ! ಅವತ್ತು ಅಷ್ಟು ತೆಳ್ಳಗಿದ್ದೆ. ಈಗ ನೋಡಿದರೆ ಒಳ್ಳೆ ಆನೆ ಮರಿ ಥರಾ ಬೆಳೆದು ಬಿಟ್ಟಿದ್ದೀಯ!" ಅಂತ ಸ್ನೇಹಾಚಾರದಿಂದ ಅವನ ಹೆಗಲ ಮೇಲೆ ಕೈ ಹಾಕಿದೆ. "ದಾಟ್ ಈಸ್ ಬಿಕಾಸ್ ಆಫ್ ಹೆವಿ ವರ್ಕ್ ಎಂಡ್ ಮೋರ್ ಈಟಿಂಗ್. ಐ ಡೋಂಟ್ ಗೆಟ್ ಟೈಮ್ ಟು ಎಕ್ಸರ್ ಸೈಸ್". ಅವನ ಈ ಉತ್ತರ ಕೇಳಿ ಅವನ ಹೆಗಲ ಮೇಲಿದ್ದ ಕೈ ತನ್ನಿಂತಾನೇ ಕೆಳಗಿಳಿಯಿತು. ಆ ಆತ್ಮೀಯತೆಯ ಭಾವ ಕಳೆದು ಹೋಯಿತು. ಆದರೂ ಸುಧಾರಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು, ಏನು ಉತ್ತರ ಎಲ್ಲ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ನಲ್ಲೇ ಕೊಡ್ತಾ ಇದ್ದೀಯ?! ಕನ್ನಡ ಮರೆತು ಹೋಯ್ತಾ ಹೇಗೆ?" ಅಂತಂದದ್ದಕ್ಕೆ, "ನಥಿಂಗ್  ದಾಟ್ ಲೈಕ್. ಬಟ್ ನೌ ಐ ನಾಟ್ ಯೂಸ್ ಡ್ ಟು ಕನದ. ಸೋ ಐ ಪ್ರಿಫರ್ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಓನ್ಲೀ" ಎಂದುತ್ತರಿಸಿದ. "ಎಲಾ ಇವನ! ಇಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ಕನ್ನಡ ಮರೆತು ಹೋಯಿತೇನೋ? ಹೋಗ್ಲಿ ಬಿಡು. ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಆದ್ರೂ ನನಗೆ ಪರವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದ್ರೆ ಅದನ್ನಾದ್ರೂ ನಮಗೆ ಅರ್ಥವಾಗುವ ಹಾಗೆ ಮಾತನಾಡು. ನೀನು ಮಾತಾಡುವ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಕೇಳಿದರೆ ಅದು ಅಲ್ಲಿಗೇ ಆದೀತು. ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯರಿಗೆ ಅರ್ಥವಾಗ್ಲಿಕ್ಕಿಲ್ಲ" ಅಂತಂದೆ. ನನ್ನ ಮಾತಿನ ಮರ್ಮವನ್ನು ಅರಿಯದ ಆತ, "ಓಹ್! ಈಸ್ ಇಟ್ ! ಗ್ರೇಟ್. ಐ ಟೂ ಗೆಸ್ಸ್ ಡ್ ದಾಟ್ ಯು ಮೇ ನಾಟ್ ಅಂಡರ್ ಸ್ಟಾಂಡ್ ಮೈ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್. ಬಿಕಾಸ್ ಇಟ್ ಈಸ್ ಕಾರ್ಪೋರೇಟ್ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್. ಯು ಪೀಪಲ್ ಸ್ಪೀಕ್ ಸಿಂಪಲ್ ಬಟ್ಲರ್ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ರೈಟ್" ಅಂತ ಅಹಂಕಾರದಿಂದ ಗೇಲಿ ಮಾಡಿದ. ಅಷ್ಟರಲ್ಲಿ ನನ್ನ ಮೊಬೈಲ್ ರಿಂಗಣಿಸಿತು. ಆ ಕಡೆಯಿಂದ ನನ್ನ ಇಂಗ್ಲೆಂಡ್ ನ ಗೆಳೆಯ ಜಾನ್ ಮಾತನಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದ. ಕೆಲವು ತಿಂಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ ಸಾಂಸ್ಕೃತಿಕ ಅಧ್ಯಯನಕ್ಕೆ ಅಂತ ನಮ್ಮೂರಿಗೆ ಬಂದು, ನಮ್ಮ ಮನೆಯಲ್ಲೇ ಒಂದು ತಿಂಗಳು ಉಳಿದು ಹೋಗಿದ್ದ. ಯುರೋಪ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ಲಾಸ್ಟಿಕ್ ರಿಸೈಕ್ಲಿಂಗ್ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಾರೆ ಅಂತ ಕೇಳಿದ್ದ ನಾನು ಅದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಆತನಲ್ಲಿ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಯನ್ನು ಕೇಳಿದ್ದೆ. ಅದಕ್ಕುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ ಬೇರೆ ಬೇರೆ ಕಡೆಯಿಂದ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಸಂಗ್ರಹಿಸಿ ನನಗೆ ಹೇಳಲು ಕರೆ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದ. ಅವನೊಂದಿಗೆ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಎಗ್ಗಿಲ್ಲದೆ ಮಾತನಾಡಿದೆ. ನಮ್ಮ ಸಂಭಾಷಣೆಯನ್ನು ಸುಮ್ಮನೇ ಕೇಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಗೆಳೆಯ ಚೇತನ್, ನನ್ನ ಮೊಬೈಲ್ ಮಾತು ಮುಗಿದಾಕ್ಷಣ ಹೇಳಿದ, "ಅಲ್ಲ ಮಾರಾಯ! ನನಗಿಂತ ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ನೀನೇ ಮಾತಾಡ್ತೀಯಲ್ಲ"?! "ಹೌದು, ಉಪಾಯವಿಲ್ಲ. ಜಾನ್ ಗೆ ಕನ್ನಡ ಬರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ನಲ್ಲೇ ಮಾತಾಡಬೇಕಷ್ಟೇ" ಎಂದೆ.  "ಕ್ಷಮಿಸು ಮಾರಾಯ. ನಾನು ನಿನಗೇನೂ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಬರಲಿಕ್ಕಿಲ್ಲ ಅಂತಂದುಕೊಂಡು ನನಗೆ ಬರುವ ಅಷ್ಟೋ, ಇಷ್ಟೋ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ನ್ನು ನಿನ್ನ ಮುಂದೆ ಮಾತಾಡಿದ್ದು. ನಿನಗೆ ಇಷ್ಟು ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಬರ್ತದೆ ಅಂತ ಮೊದಲೇ ಗೊತ್ತಿದ್ದಿದ್ರೆ ನಾನು ಆಗಲೆ ಕನ್ನಡ ಮಾತಾಡ್ತಿದ್ದೆ" ಅಂತ ತನ್ನ ಮೂರ್ಖತನವನ್ನು ಹಳಿದ. "ಓಹ್! ನೀನಿನ್ನೂ ಕನ್ನಡ ಮರೆತಿಲ್ಲ! ನಾನು ನಿನಗೆ ಕಾರ್ಪೋರೇಟ್ ಜಗತ್ತಿಗೆ ಹೋದ ಮೇಲೆ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಮರೆತು ಹೋಗಿದೆ ಅಂತಂದುಕೊಂಡೆ" ಎಂದು ಮಾತಿನಲ್ಲೇ ತಿವಿದೆ. ನನ್ನ ಮಾತಿನ ತಿವಿತವನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥವಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು, " ಆ ವಿಷಯವನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಬಿಡು ಮಾರಾಯ. ಈಗ ನೀನು ಮೊಬೈಲ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾತಾಡಿದ ವಿಷಯ ಎಂಥದ್ದು?" ಅಂತ ವಿಚಾರಿಸಿದ. ಆಗ ನನ್ನ ಪ್ಲಾಸ್ಟಿಕ್ ರಿಸೈಕ್ಲಿಂಗ್ ಯೂನಿಟ್ ನ್ನು ನಮ್ಮೂರಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಅಳವಡಿಸಿ, ತ್ಯಾಜ್ಯ ನಿರ್ವಹಣೆ ಮಾಡುವ ನನ್ನ ಆಲೋಚನೆಯ ಕುರಿತು ಅವನಿಗೆ ವಿವರಿಸಿದೆ. ಅಲ್ಲದೇ ಆ ತಂತ್ರಜ್ಞಾನ ಯೂರೋಪ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ಹೇಗೆ ಬಳಸಲ್ಪಡುತ್ತಿದೆ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನೂ ವಿವರಿಸಿದೆ. "ನಿನ್ನ ಜೊತೆ ನಾನೂ ಸೇರಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದೇ" ಅಂತ ತನ್ನ ಉತ್ಸುಕತೆಯನ್ನು ತೋರಿದ. ನನಗೂ ಒಬ್ಬನ ಸಹಾಯ ಬೇಕಿತ್ತು. ಸಂತೋಷದಿಂದ ಒಪ್ಪಿಕೊಂಡೆ. "ಸರಿ ಹಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ, ಒಟ್ಟಿಗೇ ಸೇರಿ ಪ್ಲಾನ್ ಮಾಡೋಣ, ಬಾ" ಅಂತ ಬೈಕನ್ನೇರಿದೆವು. ಹೊರಡುವ ಮೊದಲು "ನಾವು ಬೇರೆ ಭಾಷೆ, ತಂತ್ರಜ್ಞಾನವನ್ನೆಲ್ಲಾ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಿದರೂ, ನಮ್ಮತನ ಬಿಟ್ಟುಹೋಗದಂತೆ ಜಾಗ್ರತೆ ವಹಿಸಬೇಕು" ಅಂತಂದೆ. ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಚೇತನ್ "ಒಪ್ಪಿದೆ ಕಣೋ" ಅಂತ ಹೇಳಿ ನಕ್ಕ. ನಾನೂ ನಕ್ಕು, ಬೈಕ್ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿದೆವು.